The Gap seems to want to link an entire color to shopping-based activism, and that's just weird. Then yesterday I saw a dude wearing a (red) t-shirt while raking the leaves in his yard, which is sort of a hard image to link to the Gap's stated intent to "making a difference in Africa." (http://www.gap.com/browse/home.do?cid=16591&mlink=5058,650755,9&clink=65...)
Although probably it is a step up from famous people wearing sexy clothes to make a difference in Africa. (Rob Walker again: http://www.murketing.com/journal/?p=273)
Anyway, I think it's weird. "The Gap has historically been a target of anti-sweatshop activists; according to the Gap’s own data, in Africa last year, between 25 and 50 percent of the factories the Gap used to make clothes violated local labor laws on working conditions." (http://nymag.com/news/intelligencer/23175/)
You-all? Is increased awareness worth the hypocrisy? Is awareness of HIV and AIDS in Africa increasing? And where does Bono fit into all this?
And what would the corresponding PP campaign look like?






It would have to be (PRODUCT) ORANGE right?
Advertising campaigns are fun. I studied graphic design in college, so I was assigned many fake ad campaigns to run.
I saw the whole PRODUCT (RED) thing on MySpace a few days ago. I thought it was being spearheaded by someone cooler than the GAP though...