books | contact us
Home » user blogs » Nora Rocket's blog

This week, on Nora's Review of White Privilege

by Nora Rocket | 02/24/2008 | in jackassery | white privilege

Because I recognize that my words live in the public sphere on this blog, I feel like I should elaborate a bit on white privilege and my thoughts on it. This is precipitated by a small dust-up over my quoting of an alumnus from my college, who, you'll recall from my last post, did not believe in white privilege. He contacted me and, in the resulting minor dust-up, I was able to articulate more of my feelings about the unearned, often unquestioned, power of whiteness. I'm sharing them here, with the full disclosure that I did not change the mind of my interlocutor and I doubt I would be able to: we were at loggerheads at the end of the discussion, with me believing that white privilege exists and him believing that all inequity could be accounted for by racism, and believing, in fact, that the idea of white privilege itself was racist (because it ascribes a characteristic--power--to a race) and appealed to "some people, most of whom have a sheltered, self-absorbed, self-centered view of the world."

Needless to say, I do agree with this at all.

We spoke specifically about jobs--employment being one of those places where I feel like white privilege is very often in play and very infrequently questioned. Given the whiteness of board rooms, my interlocutor offered, "Perhaps there are more white people applying for a job than their(sic) are non-white people...." I ask: if one asked WHY more white people might apply for a job than would non-white people, what would that answer reflect? The simple racism of a landlord of a building in the area of the job, who did not want to rent to a non-white person, thereby keeping the person less conveniently near the job site? The simple racism of the corporation, putting forth a front (spoken or not--and if it is unspoken, what might lead one to hear it? You know my answer to that last bit...) that non-whites need not apply? The simple racism of an individual college admissions board member who didn't want to let a black student into a school that might have given that student an alumnus connection to someone who works at the corporation? Possibly even the simple racism of a non-white applicant who sees a white possible HR manager, a white possible boss, a coterie of white possible coworkers, and decides not to put in for a job because she doesn't want to work with white people?

My interlocutor offers this defense: that if 3 of 4 candidates for a job are white, all else being equal, there's a 75% chance that the hiree will be white if no acts of racism occur. And I say that "all else" will *not* be equal even if no overt, concerted racism is exercised because white privilege pervades the backstories and operational realities of all of the candidates. Ask the deeper questions, get the deeper answers.

I see an undercurrent that defines WHITE as the default, WHITE as the norm, WHITE as the prevalent racio-cultural experience, WHITE as the assumption in places as varied as the board room and the grocery store (where a another friend reports that a Mexican-American friend once went looking for a brown man's food and the white clerk did not recognize that food).

I do not understand how one can believe that there is racism in the world but deny that whiteness has advantages that are owed only to whiteness. I don't mean to put forth that white privilege is a *special kind* of racism. It's certainly tied up with racism. But my view and experience of the world has white privilege operating alongside racism as a force of continuing, behind-the-scenes empowerment of one group, by its own hand, over others.

So here's my thesis: White privilege is not something that non-white people hand over to white people, it is something that white people (that is to say, those "raced as white," which has not always been the same group it might be today) have had, historically, the luxury of benefiting from through other white peoples' own political, social, and cultural systems that have been--yes--racist. White privilege is the societal child of institutionalized racism let lose in the day care center of a wider world.

All of which is to say, there once were three fish. One swam by the other two and said "mornin' y'all, how's the water?" and the other two looked at each other and one said to the other, "what's water?"

Nora Rocket's blog | login or register to post comments
...
Submitted by Jerkus Erectus on Mon, 02/25/2008 - 8:55am.

This thread has my approval.

login or register to post comments
.
KungFuFlipperBaby's picture
Submitted by KungFuFlipperBaby on Mon, 02/25/2008 - 2:35pm.

Just as sick and insidious is popular (i.e. white) culture's insistence on re-decorating the living spaces of the non-caucasoidal participants on "home make over" type shows in gaudy animal prints. What's up with that?


login or register to post comments
.
KPunk's picture
Submitted by KPunk on Tue, 02/26/2008 - 2:37pm.

White privilege is not "the societal child" of institutional racism.
Rather it is the Janus face of that structure. It neither precedes nor follows, but is intimately intertwined. And that privilege must be 'invisible' for the practices that uphold the structure to continue.


login or register to post comments
aha!
Nora Rocket's picture
Submitted by Nora Rocket on Wed, 02/27/2008 - 8:55am.

KPunk wrote:
White privilege is not "the societal child" of institutional racism. Rather it is the Janus face of that structure. It neither precedes nor follows, but is intimately intertwined. And that privilege must be 'invisible' for the practices that uphold the structure to continue.

You've put it much better than I did. I wracked my brainz for how to say it, and "child" was the best I could do, but I think your phrasing is, indeed, more accurate.

Also, your last sentence perfectly describes why it's important to acknowledge white priv. at all. I sure wish my dink of an interlocutor might be swayed by that, but I don't think he will. He's just that bull headed.


login or register to post comments
It's the man's bag baby
The Stupid Jahnny's picture
Submitted by The Stupid Jahnny on Sat, 03/08/2008 - 11:10am.

I've worked alongside black people (and other races that don't count) for the last ten years. I like em. I work freelance so I get my black friends jobs with me because they know how to work AND listen to loud music and smoke pot all day (the disadvantage is that they're always late). But that's neither here nor there. In my position (at the bottom), I'll take all the advantages I can, and I don't think anyone is any different. Are you going to not take a job because a higher qualified person of another race applied for it? "Thank you for this excellent opportunity but I think you should give the job to Sanchez; he's better qualified." The only people this white privilege thing should matter to is bosses, human resources departments and maybe grad students who get welfare to think about things that have nothing to do with them. Maybe you are a boss or a grad student; so maybe this is an issue that you have to deal with. Or maybe you aren't white. You seem white. but then I AM a racist.


login or register to post comments
* * * *
r.john's picture
Submitted by r.john on Sat, 03/08/2008 - 12:51pm.

“I think one problem with admissions is that too many qualified White students are not getting the spots they’ve earned. These students work hard all through school and then lose their spots to members of certain groups who have lower test scores, and come from less challenging environments. They get an unfair advantage.”

In one condition, an off-screen narrator explicitly states that all participants are involved in the discussion. In the other, the narrator states that only two of the discussants (both white) could hear what was being said. The researchers then tracked participants’ eye movements as they watched the videos to examine when their gaze would shift toward the Black discussant.

I am 1.18th black


login or register to post comments
* * *
r.john's picture
Submitted by r.john on Sat, 03/08/2008 - 12:57pm.

Many U.S. citizens may not hold openly racist beliefs today, but they still may subconsciously link African Americans with apes because people still use words and metaphors that subtly reinforce a less-than-human bias and endorse violence against Blacks, according to a new study.

"Historical racist images and books dehumanizing African Americans in the 19th and early 20th century relied heavily on the Negro-ape metaphor, which was used to stereotype Blacks as lazy, dim and aggressive," said lead author Phillip Atiba Goff, assistant professor of psychology at Penn State. "Such dehumanization and animal imagery have been used for centuries to justify violence against many oppressed groups.

omelette this shit go


login or register to post comments

Punk Planet Writers' Fund

Want to help? Donate to our writers' fund so we can pay our writers for their amazing work.

Recent blog posts

  • Streaming Revolution #9 (Punk-Radio.Net)
  • SACRED LIES "WHY ME" LYRICS
  • Pimp Gun a.k.a. The El Supremo
  • Psycho Sleepover Trailer
  • Where We Exist
  • Cadillac
  • The Best School Ever
  • school: a tale of Nostalgia "badass"
  • 8 teens beat up another teen
  • My Saturday
more

New forum topics

  • old
  • Barak and Sohbet's Greek Chorus, or: The Cypriot Line
  • Barak and Sohbet Go to Rehab
  • Too Many Draculas, or: Public Domain Supervillain Theatre
  • odd
more

Active forum topics

  • old
  • pictures you have taken of the general area you live in
  • What are you listening to right now?
  • Barak and Sohbet's Greek Chorus, or: The Cypriot Line
  • Too Many Draculas, or: Public Domain Supervillain Theatre
more


out now

Navigation

  • pp: the blog
  • user blogs
    • blogger list
    • see all tags
  • forums
  • reviews
  • subscriptions
  • advertising
  • FAQs

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 26 guests online.

PP news

Stay informed on our latest news!
all text and images © 2006 Punk Planet | Punk Planet is a project of Independents' Day Media