<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.punkplanet.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Punk Planet dot com - hotness</title>
 <link>http://www.punkplanet.com/taxonomy/term/599/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>hot enough to write</title>
 <link>http://www.punkplanet.com/anne_elizabeth_moore/blog/hot_enough_to_write</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting article in the Boston Phoenix yesterday noted the growing improtance of hotness to what we consider literary talent, which makes it the only article I&#039;ve ever read in the newspaper that caused me to make a haircut appointment:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Literature, unlike so many other media industries, is technically a meritocracy. But that won’t stop book marketers, bloggers, critics, and the literary community at large from collectively slobbering over a pretty author. No, the literary rules changed ages ago. Books no longer need to be serious in order to be published; there are fewer and fewer venues available for reviews (rendering competition more intense with every passing catalogue season), and critics aren’t doing their job unless they are merciless.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.punkplanet.com/anne_elizabeth_moore/blog/hot_enough_to_write&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.punkplanet.com/anne_elizabeth_moore/blog/hot_enough_to_write#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.punkplanet.com/tags/hotness">hotness</category>
 <category domain="http://www.punkplanet.com/tags/literature">literature</category>
 <category domain="http://www.punkplanet.com/tags/publishing">publishing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:17:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>anne elizabeth moore</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2897 at http://www.punkplanet.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
