<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.punkplanet.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Punk Planet dot com - language</title>
 <link>http://www.punkplanet.com/taxonomy/term/650/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Baby, The Bathwater</title>
 <link>http://www.punkplanet.com/anne_elizabeth_moore/blog/the_baby_the_bathwater</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.namac.org&quot; /&gt;NAMAC&lt;/a&gt; panel this weekend, which &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.punkplanet.com/anne_elizabeth_moore/blog/top_ten_austin_tx&quot;&gt;as I have already mentioned&lt;/a&gt; was insanely fun, there was a question asked that stuck in my craw. Not because it wasn’t a good question: it was. It was just that the question was so much more meaningful than we gave it weight at the time, and so much more interesting than any potential answer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The question—rather, more of an assertion—was this: when discussing potential modes of communication and media-making, we should be careful not to dismiss corporate-created popular culture completely, for fear of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.punkplanet.com/anne_elizabeth_moore/blog/the_baby_the_bathwater&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.punkplanet.com/anne_elizabeth_moore/blog/the_baby_the_bathwater#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.punkplanet.com/tags/corporate_culture">corporate culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.punkplanet.com/tags/feminism">feminism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.punkplanet.com/tags/language">language</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:50:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>anne elizabeth moore</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3258 at http://www.punkplanet.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
